Home Reviews Springbank 21 Year Old

Springbank 21 Year Old

October 25, 2019 · By Henward Tan · 8.1 / 10
Rate this bottle ↓
Whiskey Consensus Score
8.1 /10
Very Good
Score Breakdown
Complexity
8.9
Nose
8.2
Palate
8.5
Finish
7.8
Value
7.2
Consensus Score
Rated by the WC community
No ratings yet — yours sets the Consensus
Nose
Palate
Finish
Complexity
Value
Rate This Bottle — Takes 15 Seconds
Nose
Palate
Finish
Complexity
Value
8.1
/ 10
Our Verdict
Very Good

Springbank - A Campbeltown whisky. One of the smallest regions in Ccotland. Springbank 21 Year Oldis 70% rum cask and 30% Bourbon.

The Good

  • Very Smooth
  • Clean Tasting

The Bad

  • Missing the Springbank Character
  • Too Clean
Springbank 21 Year Old

A little background

Springbank – A Campbeltown Whisky. One of the smallest regions in Scotland. The owner was told his region would be absorbed into another region because they had too few distilleries. So what did he do? He literally opened a new distillery just to keep the Campbeltown region officially recognized. #dedication!

One of the few companies that care about consumers – so much so, they will tell retailers not to ‘bank’ stock. If they discover someone buys up stock and sells it for more later, Springbank will basically stop selling to you. They have a cult following and are truly a ‘small batch’ whisky. This dram is 70% rum cask and 30% Bourbon. This review was of the 2018 release.

(Tasted neat from a Glencairn Glass)

Color

Gold

Nose

Over ripe and grilled pineapple, vanilla, coconut. Does not have the Springbank funk and damp dunnage smell. Toffee, burnt brown sugar and a hint of smoke, faint smoke very faint. Back end very slightly medicinal/herbal smell.

With water:
Slight salinity, salt, liquid white sugar, pineapple is still there. Pinch of earth.

Quite a clean nose for a Springbank. How weird!

Palate

Unusual because for a Springbank, it is so clean. No dunnage foosty note at all! (sad face). Crisp taste with hints of green apple, pineapple and a stainless steely taste to it (probably from the rum influence). Earthiness and slight tannin and some citrus rind, perhaps lemon rind. Cedar, sandalwood perfume and candied orange.

With water:
Cereal notes, bready and becomes drier. Caramel and burnt sugar elevates a tad and toasted coconut. Gets a tad ‘chalky’ dry.

Finish

Not too oily but waxy, sweeter side and very clean. Finish is medium to long.

In conclusion

This whisky is almost too clean – especially for a Springbank. But you may like it because of that. If you’re after a sweeter whisky, don’t add any water. If you’d prefer it to be a bit drier, add a touch of water. It’s a good whisky, a very nice whisky. However, it’s a bit too sterile for my liking of a Springbank.

Is it worth while? Yes and No. It is expensive, you can buy 3 bottles of other Springbanks for the price of this – so maybe I would rather have the 12yo cask strength, 15 and 18 instead of this one bottle. 

*NOTE: Formulations of Springbank releases change year on year, one year will be totally different to another year so one cannot judge from the 2018 vs what the next one will be.

Springbank 21 Year Old

92 Proof
8.1

Complexity

8.9/10

Nose

8.2/10

Palate

8.5/10

Finish

7.8/10

Value

7.2/10

The Good

  • Very Smooth
  • Clean Tasting

The Bad

  • Missing the Springbank Character
  • Too Clean
Tried this one? Rate it in 15 seconds — your score shapes the Consensus. Rate it now ↓
Review Scotch Single Malt Single Malt Review Springbank

Every bottle on Whiskey Consensus is evaluated across five categories on a 1–100 scale. The five scores are averaged to produce a final overall score out of 10.

Nose
Aroma, complexity & first impressions
Palate
Flavor, balance & mouthfeel
Finish
Length, character & quality
Complexity
Depth, layers & evolution in the glass
Value
Quality relative to retail price
Score Rating What It Means
9.5 – 10.0ExceptionalOne for the history books
9.0 – 9.4OutstandingA benchmark expression
8.5 – 8.9GreatSeek this bottle out
8.0 – 8.4Very GoodAbove average in every way
7.5 – 7.9GoodWorth your money
7.0 – 7.4Above AverageA solid everyday pour
6.5 – 6.9AverageUnremarkable but drinkable
6.0 – 6.4Below AverageHard to recommend
5.5 – 5.9Hard PassBetter options at this price
0.0 – 5.4AvoidNot worth your time or money
Henward Tan
About the Author
Henward Tan
Whiskey Reviewer · Whiskey Consensus  · 16 posts

Henward is based in New Zealand with a fixation on Scotch whisky (pork and cigars), in particular single malt whisky. A naturally obsessive person, Henward tends to go down the rabbit hole with things (to the dismay of his wife) and that journey has led him to the wonderland of independently bottled (IBs) scotch whisky and ‘off the beaten path’ bottlings. Bottlings that can be challenging yet satisfying or ones that can be polarising or hard to find rare whisky. Henward’s choices are about experiences. Outside the world of whisky and cigars Henward owns and operates a social media management company with his wife based in NZ. You can keep track of Henward and his shannanigans on Instagram or YouTube @eat_smoke_drink.

More by Henward Tan →
Every expert score has a flip side.

The Community Consensus is built from real ratings by people who've actually poured this bottle. Add yours and see where you land.

✦ Add Your Score

Keep Exploring

Hundreds of expert reviews and counting. Find your next bottle by style, distillery, or score.