Home Reviews Johnnie Walker Blue Label

Johnnie Walker Blue Label

October 18, 2019 · By Henward Tan · 6.8 / 10
Rate this bottle ↓
Whiskey Consensus Score
6.8 /10
Average
Score Breakdown
Complexity
6.5
Nose
9.5
Palate
7
Finish
6
Value
5
Consensus Score
Rated by the WC community
No ratings yet — yours sets the Consensus
Nose
Palate
Finish
Complexity
Value
Rate This Bottle — Takes 15 Seconds
Nose
Palate
Finish
Complexity
Value
6.8
/ 10
Our Verdict
Average

The Clynelish is apparent - that is a perfume and waxy smell, Floral and sweet. A tad of smoke, Not much peat but a tad of smoke.

The Good

  • The Nose

The Bad

  • Price
  • Lack of finish
  • Lack of substance
Johnnie Walker Blue Label

A little background

The Johnnie Walker Blue label. We have all seen this – in liquor stores way up on the top shelf. Whether you have been to an Indian wedding, Vietnamese Buck Night or had to buy a gift for a Chinese business associate, Blue Label seems to be a global currency for this sort of gift. Johnnie Walker Blue Label employs barrels form many Malts and Grain whisky – Apparently only 1 in 10,000 barrels are good for a Johnnie Walker Blue Label. Really? These are piled on the shelves of every Duty Free Store on the planet so there must be MILLIONS of barrels to choose from. So don’t let that influence your thoughts. This whisky contains a lot of Clynelish, Cardhu and Benrinnes which are exceptionally awesome single malts!

According to Johnnie Walker, Blue Label is best enjoyed alternate between sips of whisky and cold water.

(Tasted neat from a Glencairn Glass)

Color

Amber Gold

Nose

The Clynelish is apparent – that is a perfume and waxy smell, Floral and sweet. A tad of smoke, Not much peat but a tad of smoke. Cherry, fruity, slight spice – cinnamon, fruitcake (probably sherry influence) Earthiness, cocoa, chocolate. The nose is complex and very nice and pleasant. 

Palate

Distinct smokiness – Like a bonfire that has no flames and no smoke, just the charcoal and soot smell. Pleasant. Fruitcake, raisins, nutmeg, cinnamon – sherry element there. Dark chocolate, slight salinity and bitterness on the end of the palate and that reminds me of dark chocolate. Alternating water with sips – Please look at the conclusion why I believe they have asked you to do this.

Finish

Very short. Very shallow. No progression.

In conclusion

It does not say “no artificial coloring” – so the color is probably enhanced with caramel colourant. I also believe it is chill filtered. Why water alternating sips? I believe that they say this as the water acts as palate cleanser. So every sip feels like a new sip or close to it. The whisky does not progress – Good whisky or good single malts tend to progress within each sip, but this has no progression, Each sip is the same as the next – in fact without water alternating you find that it dulls in flavor a lot. 

Additionally, my main gripe is that it is 40%. Seriously now, 40%? You need to bump that to 43% to 45% for a ‘super premium’ whisky and marketed as such! Then this okay to good whisky might just become a great whisky. The Issue I have as well is that by making it 40%, you are essentially maximizing your volume and not consumer experience. 

Johnnie Walker Blue Label

80 Proof
6.8

Complexity

6.5/10

Nose

9.5/10

Palate

7.0/10

Finish

6.0/10

Value

5.0/10

The Good

  • The Nose

The Bad

  • Price
  • Lack of finish
  • Lack of substance
Tried this one? Rate it in 15 seconds — your score shapes the Consensus. Rate it now ↓
Blended Johnnie Walker Review Scotch

Every bottle on Whiskey Consensus is evaluated across five categories on a 1–100 scale. The five scores are averaged to produce a final overall score out of 10.

Nose
Aroma, complexity & first impressions
Palate
Flavor, balance & mouthfeel
Finish
Length, character & quality
Complexity
Depth, layers & evolution in the glass
Value
Quality relative to retail price
Score Rating What It Means
9.5 – 10.0ExceptionalOne for the history books
9.0 – 9.4OutstandingA benchmark expression
8.5 – 8.9GreatSeek this bottle out
8.0 – 8.4Very GoodAbove average in every way
7.5 – 7.9GoodWorth your money
7.0 – 7.4Above AverageA solid everyday pour
6.5 – 6.9AverageUnremarkable but drinkable
6.0 – 6.4Below AverageHard to recommend
5.5 – 5.9Hard PassBetter options at this price
0.0 – 5.4AvoidNot worth your time or money
Henward Tan
About the Author
Henward Tan
Whiskey Reviewer · Whiskey Consensus  · 16 posts

Henward is based in New Zealand with a fixation on Scotch whisky (pork and cigars), in particular single malt whisky. A naturally obsessive person, Henward tends to go down the rabbit hole with things (to the dismay of his wife) and that journey has led him to the wonderland of independently bottled (IBs) scotch whisky and ‘off the beaten path’ bottlings. Bottlings that can be challenging yet satisfying or ones that can be polarising or hard to find rare whisky. Henward’s choices are about experiences. Outside the world of whisky and cigars Henward owns and operates a social media management company with his wife based in NZ. You can keep track of Henward and his shannanigans on Instagram or YouTube @eat_smoke_drink.

More by Henward Tan →
Every expert score has a flip side.

The Community Consensus is built from real ratings by people who've actually poured this bottle. Add yours and see where you land.

✦ Add Your Score

Keep Exploring

Hundreds of expert reviews and counting. Find your next bottle by style, distillery, or score.